Apologies if this has been discussed, but I haven't read anything about it. We all at least enjoy Devin's music, some of us fanatically so. Devin has mentioned in interview many times that if the revenue streams dry up, there can be no more music that's publicly available. Surely Devin has considered fan-funding the recording of his albums and I'm wondering why he doesn't go that route. Not even popular outfits like Kickstarter, but I wonder if even donations made directly to HevyDevy Records would be leagues and fathoms better financially than relying on the record label.
I'll use Deconstruction in this example. Granted, Deconstruction was not the average record. Paying different musicians including the Prague Orchestra, travel, etc, tremendously increased the cost. Devin said on the Deconstruction Commentary that making Deconstruction cost, close to $60k."
And I know Devin doesn't like the term "fan," but I'll use it here for the sake of simplicity.
EXAMPLE
- Deconstruction cost $60,000.
- Epicloud sold 4000 copies in 1st week (US).
- Assume 4000 fans donated $15 each. There's your $60,000 to cover the cost of recording the album.
- Yes, I know fans have already spent $15 and haven't even got a CD yet, but I'm sure a lot of us would gladly pay lots more for HevyDevy releases.
- CD sales beyond the 1st week are just pure profit since the recording was already paid for.
Again, this example uses the super-expensive Deconstruction record. If the average record costs $30,000, Devin could either retain the extra $$$ for future projects or reduce the cost of donations. Of course, income from touring and merchandise will still be there.
The purpose of all this is simply to easily fund the recording without going into debt. It cannot fix downloaders who don't buy CD's. But if the funding of the RECORDING is done without having to pay back a loan to the label, it just seems like he would be much better off financially.
Thoughts? REALLY looking forward to Casualties Of Cool.
Thanks, Jason
I'll use Deconstruction in this example. Granted, Deconstruction was not the average record. Paying different musicians including the Prague Orchestra, travel, etc, tremendously increased the cost. Devin said on the Deconstruction Commentary that making Deconstruction cost, close to $60k."
And I know Devin doesn't like the term "fan," but I'll use it here for the sake of simplicity.
EXAMPLE
- Deconstruction cost $60,000.
- Epicloud sold 4000 copies in 1st week (US).
- Assume 4000 fans donated $15 each. There's your $60,000 to cover the cost of recording the album.
- Yes, I know fans have already spent $15 and haven't even got a CD yet, but I'm sure a lot of us would gladly pay lots more for HevyDevy releases.
- CD sales beyond the 1st week are just pure profit since the recording was already paid for.
Again, this example uses the super-expensive Deconstruction record. If the average record costs $30,000, Devin could either retain the extra $$$ for future projects or reduce the cost of donations. Of course, income from touring and merchandise will still be there.
The purpose of all this is simply to easily fund the recording without going into debt. It cannot fix downloaders who don't buy CD's. But if the funding of the RECORDING is done without having to pay back a loan to the label, it just seems like he would be much better off financially.
Thoughts? REALLY looking forward to Casualties Of Cool.
Thanks, Jason