Octillus wrote:I just had a dream for a really odd movie concept.
Dunno if I want to elaborate too much, but it does have the main character making love to a female truck driver (in a PG 13 sense) as her semi truck drives up a ramp and through a burning ring of fire.
AlucardXIX wrote:Octillus wrote:I just had a dream for a really odd movie concept.
Dunno if I want to elaborate too much, but it does have the main character making love to a female truck driver (in a PG 13 sense) as her semi truck drives up a ramp and through a burning ring of fire.
Please do elaborate. I like this ramp and ring of fire deal.
I know this is kinda goofy but this is something I just dreamt about that I'd rather not forget. While I haven't decided if this is a mockumentary or just a film, basically it's about two British actors, one slightly older but pretty moderately successful, one younger but up and coming and going to be a huge star. The idea is that they basically starred in an independent action film a few years back in the vein of kind of a James Bond Goldeneye (none of this serious Daniel Craig crap) that was lighthearted and extremely successful. Younger guy protagonist, older guy mentor turned antagonist. A bigger studio signs on to do the sequel, they get a great director and use all kinds of special effects and it goes terrifically and is a huge box office success. This is where the film would start would be the red carpet from there. They're on top of the world, everything is great until the contract stipulation for the third film basically states that both of the actors need to be frozen for 5 years, since the next film is supposed to take place immediately afterward, but the studio afraid of gambling on the franchise hadn't started any preproduction yet. So basically the two actors are frozen, and when they return to the land of the living, the older actor finds out that he had starred in a series of extremely poorly received advertisements, tv series, and direct to home video films by taking his frozen image and using cgi to alter it. In fact the credits for the sitcom that he starred in has credits roll by saying the actor's frozen mostly immobile kinda-corpse. From there they kick-start production on the third film in the trilogy, and that's when everything goes awry. The younger actor is becoming extremely succesful due to a line of endorsement deals, while the older actor is kinda being swept under the carpet. A new director (very much a brett ratner) steps into the franchise and has different ideas of how things should go. For example during a chase scene the younger actor makes love to a female truck driver and she climaxes as the big rig goes up a ramp and through a burning ring of fire. Eventually it's decided that the studio would make more money if both of the actors died in a terrible accident and they could collect on the insurance and use most of the setpieces to make a film about talking dogs instead. This leads to a somewhat climactic scene where the two actors who are talked into to doing their own stunts to really raise the bar and the two actors are freefalling, locked one arm and shooting at each other but actually with real bullets, but they don't realize it, til halfway down, as well as that only one of their parachutes work. Then I woke up.
Leechmaster wrote:We haven't had a good ol' tl;dr in ages!
Nah, I jest. If it ever gets made and I've forgotten that I've read exactly what the film is about I may go see it. But it better have the Brosnan in it!
Leechmaster wrote:What you should do as well is make the movie trailer absolutely 100% completely nothing to do with the actual film...
Leechmaster wrote:We haven't had a good ol' tl;dr in ages!
Nah, I jest. If it ever gets made and I've forgotten that I've read exactly what the film is about I may go see it. But it better have the Brosnan in it!
AlucardXIX wrote:Leechmaster wrote:We haven't had a good ol' tl;dr in ages!
Nah, I jest. If it ever gets made and I've forgotten that I've read exactly what the film is about I may go see it. But it better have the Brosnan in it!
Hahaha
Yea I read the whole thing. I was actually expecting more of a screen play type deal.
Phase wrote:Recently bough a new guitar. I love it, it sounds awesome, feels right in my hands, ad is one f he few things I've bought entirely for me. It's lovely.
But I've found a problem. It has a Tune-o-Matic bridge, and I'm finding it really hard to palm mute. I'm hoping it's only a technique thing, cause I don't want to get rid of it. ;-;
Abydost wrote:Phase wrote:Recently bough a new guitar. I love it, it sounds awesome, feels right in my hands, ad is one f he few things I've bought entirely for me. It's lovely.
But I've found a problem. It has a Tune-o-Matic bridge, and I'm finding it really hard to palm mute. I'm hoping it's only a technique thing, cause I don't want to get rid of it. ;-;
String through? I have that on my Schecter, it's why I dislike it on the Devy signature. Even harder to do sixteenths.
Phase wrote:Abydost wrote:Phase wrote:Recently bough a new guitar. I love it, it sounds awesome, feels right in my hands, ad is one f he few things I've bought entirely for me. It's lovely.
But I've found a problem. It has a Tune-o-Matic bridge, and I'm finding it really hard to palm mute. I'm hoping it's only a technique thing, cause I don't want to get rid of it. ;-;
String through? I have that on my Schecter, it's why I dislike it on the Devy signature. Even harder to do sixteenths.
Aye, string through. I have no problem playing quickly, just the palm mutes sound like PARP.
Phase wrote:Abydost wrote:Phase wrote:Recently bough a new guitar. I love it, it sounds awesome, feels right in my hands, ad is one f he few things I've bought entirely for me. It's lovely.
But I've found a problem. It has a Tune-o-Matic bridge, and I'm finding it really hard to palm mute. I'm hoping it's only a technique thing, cause I don't want to get rid of it. ;-;
String through? I have that on my Schecter, it's why I dislike it on the Devy signature. Even harder to do sixteenths.
Aye, string through. I have no problem playing quickly, just the palm mutes sound like PARP.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 163 guests
