Talk about whatever you want to here, but stay correct
#283971 by sylkicks
Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:10 pm
Horror film 'o the the day:

10/11: My horror film for the day was Herbert Wise's "The Woman in Black." This film was suggested by Mr. Jeff Caxide, the originator of the October Horror Film Binge (at least that's what I'm calling it), as I've been craving a good ghost horror movie this month after I've had a string of slashers the past few days. All in all, I was not disappointed. The story follows a young lawyer as he is sent to settle the estate of an elderly woman who has died and finds her home and the town outside it haunted with her presence-- i.e. her continued appearances watching him from afar. For a ghost film "The Woman in Black" relies less on sudden, make-you-jump scares and instead uses a heavily foreboding, dark mood, visuals, and, what I found most interesting, sounds to achieve it's horror. The most notable of these being the blood curdling scream heard repeatedly by the lawyer, a resounding sound of a youth and his mothers death, and the audience feels the chills from its piercing scream as well. However, I felt with this being so strong the film never quite reaches this level with any of it's other scenes meant to scare, save perhaps a nighttime visit by the spirit near the end of the film. The film is very strong as well in how it follows the lawyers descent into madness at being cursed with his visions, eventually leading to a very poetic and disturbing end. "The Woman in Black" is a slow burner which I did not mind, but sometimes it does linger too long on one thing or another rather than achieving an even bigger level of fear and intrigue I feel it had the potential for. Seeing the upcoming remake will be an interesting comparison.
8/10

http://lensesnbrews.blogspot.com/2011/10/woman-in-black.html
#284006 by shiram
Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:27 am
Not a movie per se, but the trailer for the Avengers flick.
Totally boring trailer for me, shows symptons of declining genre and brings nothing new.
Yea I got that from only 2 minutes of clipped footage.
#284025 by sylkicks
Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:44 pm
Horror film today:

10/12: For today's horror film I embark once again into Lovecraft territory with Andrew Leman's " The Call of Cthulhu." Probably Lovecraft's most famous story and one of the most influential stories on many different types of media from literature (Stephen King, Neil Geiman) to music (notably Metallica songs such as The Thing that Should Not Be and Call of Kthulu) to films (innumerable to name), this film does the most justice to Lovecraft's story of any Lovecraft-based film I've ever seen. Presented as a silent film to better suit the era in which Lovecraft wrote and set his story (also surely as a way to better hide the insanely small budget this film had), Leman does a mostly stellar job in evoking the feeling of the silent era. Leman draws much from German Expressionism (my favorite era of film making) especially in the dream sequences and the final confrontation with Cthulhu. The mood and lighting of the film as well show these influences and yield greatly to this monster-god tale. However, this silent approach is not without it's flaws-- sometimes rather than yielding to the story these techniques blatantly show how the choice to go the silent route were surely influenced by budgetary decisions. The over-the-top silent acting is sometimes too much so, showing bad acting even without words. When Cthulhu is finally revealed as well as a claymation monster one can't help thinking that, while this is realistic for a film of the era, it was surely even more greatly a budgetary decision. All in all, though, Leman does a great job with what he is given and brings Lovecraft's landmark story perfectly to life on the screen. I can't help but be think, though, after seeing this film, that this story is yearning for a proper, big budget treatment. The source material is so good it more than deserves it and it baffles my mind someone hasn't created it yet. Maybe sometime soon, and this is a more than a great start.
8.5/10
http://lensesnbrews.blogspot.com/2011/10/for-todays-horror-film-i-again-into.html

I'm getting more and more longwinded with each post.... :?
#284027 by Faffy
Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:47 pm
Saw Pirates of the Caribbean 4 last night.
Loved it.

There must be something wrong with everyone else.
#284031 by EphelDuath666
Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:36 pm
City of the living Dead/ The gates of hell

Image

IMDb wrote:In the small New England town of Dunwich, a priest commits suicide by hanging himself in the church cemetery which somehow opens the gates of hell allowing the dead to rise. Peter, a New York City reporter, teams up with a young psychic, named Mary, to travel to the town where they team up with another couple, psychiatrist Jerry and patient Sandra, to find a way to close the gates before All Saints Day or the dead all over the world will rise up and kill the living.


this is the latest one I watched. As with most Fulci films and most other italian horror films in general, there's not a whole lot of story or plot to this movie, Fulci focused more on atmosphere and visual effects. The acting is not always great as usual, to say the least, and the dubbing is sometimes seriously bad and laughable. Besides it's not really Fulci's best horror flick either but I still enjoy it. It's one of those movies that was and still is banned here and just always had this cult following because it's banned. If they re-rated this movie today it would probably get an FSK16 taking but getting that done costs quite a bit of money so it probably won't happen. Plus they'd first have to get it unbanned. Bureaucracy at its "finest".
#284036 by Octillus
Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:58 pm
Dunkelheit wrote:
Faffy wrote:Saw Pirates of the Caribbean 4 last night.
Loved it.

There must be something wrong with everyone else.


i loved it, whats everyone else sayin'


That there need not be a series after the first film.
#284040 by Dunkelheit
Wed Oct 12, 2011 3:22 pm
Octillus wrote:
Dunkelheit wrote:
Faffy wrote:Saw Pirates of the Caribbean 4 last night.
Loved it.

There must be something wrong with everyone else.


i loved it, whats everyone else sayin'


That there need not be a series after the first film.


tomfoolery!
#284066 by JuZ
Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:14 am
Hmmmm... I'm in the middle. Enjoyed the first and second films, was over it by the third and didn't bother with the fourth.

Not a bad run for a movie based on an old Disney theme ride.
#284067 by Faffy
Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:16 am
I LOVED the third one. O____o

And the soundtrack.... ASDFGHHHHHJKLØØØØØØØH :3 <3
#284079 by Bookwyrm83
Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:13 am
JuZ wrote:Hmmmm... I'm in the middle. Enjoyed the first and second films, was over it by the third and didn't bother with the fourth.

Not a bad run for a movie based on an old Disney theme ride.


Exactly the same. Watched the trailer for the fourth and thought, "Yeah....meh." Maybe I'll rent it someday.

And I liked the Disneyland ride.
#284081 by Keeker
Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:29 am
Bookwyrm83 wrote:
JuZ wrote:Hmmmm... I'm in the middle. Enjoyed the first and second films, was over it by the third and didn't bother with the fourth.

Not a bad run for a movie based on an old Disney theme ride.


Exactly the same. Watched the trailer for the fourth and thought, "Yeah....meh." Maybe I'll rent it someday.

And I liked the Disneyland ride.

I was disappointed by the fourth one. I didn't feel much for any of the characters really.
#284090 by shiram
Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:55 am
JuZ wrote:Hmmmm... I'm in the middle. Enjoyed the first and second films, was over it by the third and didn't bother with the fourth.

Not a bad run for a movie based on an old Disney theme ride.


Yup that's pretty much how I feel about that franchise.
Third was just too over the top...
A buddy of mine told me Disney bought the likeness of Johnny Depp as Captain Jack Sparrow, and they pay him a yearly sum of about 30 millions.
#284092 by sylkicks
Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:02 am
In all honesty... I don't know how you can like the third. Giant lady falls apart into crabs while Johnny Depp searches frantically for a peanut? Huh. Alrighty then.

Second one was decent, first one was of course awesome, but I have yet to see the 4th. Perhaps at some point.
#284107 by Faffy
Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:33 am
YOU ARE ALL WROOOONG!! MY PERSONAL TASTE IN FILMS IS SUPERIOR!

Notlisteningnotlisteningnotlistening.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MicrozaJen, SaburaMeapy, Tyrvegrya, Zaineaincon and 7 guests